Examiner Steven D Radosevich has allowed 53 of 71 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Steven D Radosevich maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 71 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 75%, with 53 allowed and 18 abandoned. This figure is computed from decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record reflects outcomes pooled across all art units under this examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate represents historical disposition data and is not predictive of outcomes in any specific case.
A pooled record aggregates decisions across multiple art units within a technology center. The overall allowance rate reflects the examiner's historical pattern of dispositions across all assigned art units combined. Aggregate figures describe past outcomes and do not constitute predictions about any particular application. Individual art-unit records, where available, may reveal variation within the pooled total.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 20 decided applications with an interview and 37 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Steven D Radosevich has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 71 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP