Examiner Steven G Snyder

What the data says.

Steven G Snyder maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,030 total applications, 815 have been allowed and 182 abandoned, yielding 997 disposed applications. The allowance rate, calculated over disposed applications, is 82%. This rate reflects the examiner's pooled record across a single art unit and describes past dispositions without prediction of outcomes in any specific case.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across all art units under which the examiner works. The 82% allowance rate describes the historical share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and does not constitute a prediction for any particular application. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units and examiner behavior on specific rejection grounds or claim types. Review art-unit-specific data separately for closer detail.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.

Questions about Examiner Steven G Snyder

• 01What is Steven G Snyder's overall allowance rate?

  82%, calculated as allowed applications divided by disposed (decided) applications across all art units. This is 815 allowed out of 997 disposed applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  One art unit (2184). This pooled record covers that single art unit only.
• 03Does the 82% allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's fate. Outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and application-specific facts.
• 04What subject matter does this examiner handle?

  Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Art unit 2184 is included within that technology center.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.