Examiner Su-Ting Chuang has allowed 54 of 107 decided applications (50%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Su-Ting Chuang maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 107 disposed applications, 54 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 50%. The examiner's allowance rate ranges from 47% to 53% across these art units. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's record in art units 2122 and 2146 and reflects decisions rendered over the period covered by the public data. The record includes 53 abandoned applications among the total decided count.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's activity across multiple art units, producing a single overall allowance rate. This aggregate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. When an examiner covers more than one art unit, allowance rates may vary by unit; the range shown (47% to 53%) reflects that variation. The pooled rate describes the examiner's historical performance as a whole but does not forecast how any individual application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 34 decided applications with an interview and 15 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 28 decided applications with an interview and 30 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Su-Ting Chuang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 145 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP