Examiner Subir Kumar Chowdhury

What the data says.

Examiner Subir Kumar Chowdhury maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. Across 75 total applications, 35 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 35 decided applications, 28 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 80%. Seven applications were abandoned. This record represents the examiner's pooled activity and describes past outcomes only, without bearing on any specific pending case.

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record aggregates activity across one art unit within TC 2100. The 80% allowance rate is computed from 35 decided applications (allowed and abandoned combined) and reflects historical dispositions. Pooled figures across art units describe the examiner's past record and are not predictions of future decisions or outcomes in individual applications. Each case is examined on its own merits.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Subir Kumar Chowdhury

• 01What is Examiner Chowdhury's overall allowance rate?

  80%. This rate is based on 35 decided applications (28 allowed, 7 abandoned) and reflects the examiner's pooled record across all art units.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  One art unit (2132) within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 03What do these figures represent?

  This is a historical record of 75 total applications. The allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 04Does the allowance rate apply to my application?

  No. The rate is a summary of past decisions and does not predict the result in any individual case, which is examined independently.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.