Examiner Suman Rajaputra has allowed 121 of 173 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Suman Rajaputra maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 173 decided applications, the examiner allowed 121, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. Across the examiner's art units, allowance rates range from 65% to 75%. The examiner has also recorded 52 abandoned applications. This pooled record aggregates activity across multiple art units and describes the examiner's past dispositions; it is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This record pools allowance and abandonment data across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 70% allowance rate reflects the share of decided applications that were allowed, calculated from 173 total dispositions. The range of 65% to 75% across art units shows variation by field. Pooled figures describe historical record and do not predict the outcome of any individual application or indicate how a future case will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 48 decided applications with an interview and 34 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 62 decided applications with an interview and 29 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Suman Rajaputra has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 214 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP