Examiner Sunil Sundar has allowed 10 of 23 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Sunil Sundar maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 23 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 10 and abandoned 13. The allowance rate is 43% over the 23 decided cases. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all filings in that unit and does not account for applications still pending examination.
This record aggregates all applications decided within the examiner's assigned art unit(s). The 43% allowance rate describes historical outcomes across 23 closed cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's fate. Pooled statistics combine different application types and claim complexities. Past rates are correlational data about the examiner's record, not causal indicators of future prosecution results.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 23 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Sunil Sundar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 23 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP