Examiner Sy D Luu has allowed 114 of 147 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Sy D Luu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 147 disposed applications, 114 were allowed and 33 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 78%. This figure represents the percentage of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's pooled record and does not include pending cases. The record reflects outcomes across all art units under this examiner's jurisdiction as of the data snapshot.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across one art unit and reports the examiner's overall allowance rate over all decided applications. Aggregate figures describe the past record only and are not predictions about any specific application or art unit. Individual art units may have different profiles; per-art-unit data is available separately. Allowance rates are correlational snapshots, not causal indicators of prosecution outcomes.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 34 decided applications with an interview and 113 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Sy D Luu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 147 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP