Examiner Syed Rayhan Ahmed has allowed 10 of 13 decided applications (77%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Syed Rayhan Ahmed maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 44 total applications, 13 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 13 disposed applications, 10 were allowed and 3 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 77% over the decided count. The examiner works within a single art unit (2126). This record reflects historical outcomes on decided applications only; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's decided applications across their art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 77% allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rate is computed only from decided applications—allowed plus abandoned—and does not include pending or withdrawn filings. Pooled figures reflect the examiner's overall pattern but do not account for individual application circumstances.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 44 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Syed Rayhan Ahmed has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 44 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP