Examiner Tadesse Hailu has allowed 1,028 of 1,314 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Tadesse Hailu has a public record spanning two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,314 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 78%. This figure reflects 1,028 allowed applications against 286 abandoned applications. The allowance rate ranges from 70% to 97% across these art units, reflecting variation in the examiner's record by subject matter within TC 2100.
A pooled record aggregates results across multiple art units, providing a bird's-eye view of an examiner's historical decisions. The figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. The allowance rate is computed from decided cases only (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending applications. Variation across art units is common and reflects differences in subject matter and case complexity.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 284 decided applications with an interview and 620 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 117 decided applications with an interview and 293 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tadesse Hailu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,361 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP