Examiner Taghi T Arani has allowed 80 of 95 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Taghi T Arani maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 95 disposed applications, 80 were allowed and 15 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 84%. This figure represents the share of decided cases in the examiner's pooled record. The record reflects outcomes across art units 2131 and 2139. These figures describe the examiner's historical disposition of applications and do not constitute a prediction for any individual case.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units within a technology center. The allowance rate shown here combines all decided applications under this examiner's responsibility. Aggregate figures describe past disposition and are correlational only—they do not predict outcomes for any specific application. Individual art-unit records may differ from the pooled average and are available separately on this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 23 decided applications with an interview and 53 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Taghi T Arani has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 95 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP