Examiner Tahilba O Puche has allowed 132 of 175 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Tahilba O Puche maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 175 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 75%, meaning 132 applications were allowed and 43 were abandoned. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate represents the share of decided applications and does not account for any pending filings. The pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across all art units in which the examiner has disposed applications.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's decisions across multiple art units, if applicable. The allowance rate and application counts reflect historical disposition data and describe the past record only. Pooled figures are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Art-unit-level detail, where available, may show variation within the examiner's overall record and is found in separate sections of this profile.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 80 decided applications with an interview and 95 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tahilba O Puche has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 175 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP