Examiner Tamara Teslovich Kyle has allowed 48 of 85 decided applications (56%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tamara Teslovich Kyle maintains a public record across 4 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 85 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 56%, meaning 48 applications were allowed and 37 were abandoned. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 44% to 76%. This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome across all four art units and does not reflect performance in any single unit.
This record pools data from multiple art units within TC 2100, aggregating different subject areas and examination histories into one overall allowance rate. The 56% figure describes past dispositions across all units combined and is not a forecast for any individual application. The range (44% to 76%) reflects variation among the art units but does not identify which units produced which rates. Pooled statistics describe historical outcomes, not predicted ones.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 21 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Based on 9 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Based on 1 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tamara Teslovich Kyle has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 85 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP