Examiner Tameem Siddiquee has allowed 149 of 237 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Tameem Siddiquee maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 237 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 149 cases, yielding an allowance rate of 63%. The record reflects a pooled aggregate of work across multiple art units within TC 2100. Of the 295 total applications on file, 88 were abandoned. This public record represents the examiner's historical disposition of decided cases and does not constitute a prediction of outcome for any pending or future application.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's output across multiple art units in TC 2100 and reflects past dispositions. The 63% allowance rate describes the share of decided applications that resulted in allowance, calculated from the total disposed count—not from all filings, which include pending cases. Aggregate figures characterize the historical record and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art-unit performance may vary from the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 118 decided applications with an interview and 109 without.
Based on 10 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tameem Siddiquee has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 295 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP