Examiner Tammara R Peyton has allowed 1,284 of 1,421 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Tammara R Peyton maintains a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,421 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 1,284 applications, yielding an overall allowance rate of 90%. The allowance rate ranges from 84% to 94% across the examiner's art units. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes from multiple art units and represents the examiner's historical record on decided applications—those marked allowed or abandoned, excluding pending matters.
This record is pooled across multiple art units and reflects historical allowance rates, not a prediction for any specific application. The aggregate allowance rate describes past outcomes in the aggregate and varies by art unit. Reviewing an examiner's pooled record provides context on historical decisions across their portfolio, but individual application outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and application-specific facts that these statistics do not capture.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 284 decided applications with an interview and 603 without.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 33 decided applications with an interview and 501 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tammara R Peyton has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,455 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP