Examiner Tammy Eunhye Lee

What the data says.

Tammy Eunhye Lee maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 473 total applications, 378 were allowed and 70 were abandoned, yielding 448 disposed applications. The allowance rate is 84% of those decided applications. The examiner's work spans one art unit, 2195. This record reflects historical outcomes only and does not predict results for any individual application.

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates Lee's work across one art unit in TC 2100. The 84% allowance rate is a historical measure of decided cases—allowed plus abandoned—and describes past dispositions only. Aggregate figures across an examiner's art units do not constitute a prediction about any specific application, nor do they indicate how any particular prosecution will proceed.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines program control and execution.

Questions about Examiner Tammy Eunhye Lee

• 01What is Tammy Eunhye Lee's allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 84%, calculated from 378 allowed and 70 abandoned applications out of 448 total disposed applications. This is a historical measure and is not a prediction for any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Lee's record spans one art unit: 2195, within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What do these figures represent?

  The figures represent historical outcomes across 473 total applications. The allowance rate and disposition counts describe the past record only and are correlational data, not predictive of any future application outcome.
• 04Can I use this record to predict my application's result?

  No. Aggregate historical data does not predict individual application outcomes. Every application is examined on its own merits based on the claims, specification, prior art, and applicable law.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.