Examiner Tan H Tran has allowed 195 of 319 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tan H Tran has a pooled public record spanning 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 319 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 61%. The examiner's allowance rate ranges from 56% to 70% across these art units. Of the 393 total applications on record, 195 were allowed and 124 were abandoned. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across multiple art units and reflects the examiner's historical record without indication of outcomes on any pending or future application.
A pooled, cross-art-unit record combines allowance data from multiple art units into a single aggregate figure. The 61% allowance rate describes past decisions on 319 closed applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range from 56% to 70% shows variation among the examiner's art units; the aggregate masks this variation. Pooled statistics describe historical performance and serve as background context only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 134 decided applications with an interview and 70 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 81 decided applications with an interview and 34 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tan H Tran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 393 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP