Examiner Tanim M Hossain has allowed 43 of 78 decided applications (55%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tanim M Hossain maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 78 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 43 and abandoned 35. The allowance rate stands at 55% of decided applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure represents applications disposed over the examiner's tenure in this technology center and reflects the examiner's historical record of allowances relative to total decisions.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units where the examiner works. The allowance rate of 55% describes what portion of decided applications received allowances historically and is calculated from disposed applications only—pending cases are excluded. Aggregate figures describe the past record and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit records, where available, may show variation from the pooled rate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 18 decided applications with an interview and 60 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tanim M Hossain has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 78 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP