Examiner Techane Gergiso has allowed 63 of 80 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Techane Gergiso maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner has disposed of 80 applications across a single art unit. Of those 80 decided applications, 63 were allowed and 17 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. This rate reflects the examiner's pooled historical record and describes applications already decided; it is not a prediction of outcomes for any pending or future application.
This record aggregates the examiner's work across all art units under their jurisdiction. The allowance rate of 79% is calculated from decided applications only—allowed and abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Aggregate figures describe the past record and are correlational in nature. They do not indicate how any specific application will be examined or decided, nor do they account for variations in application complexity, claim scope, or prior art across different matters.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 53 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Techane Gergiso has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 80 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP