Examiner Terri L Filosi has allowed 44 of 110 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Terri L Filosi maintains a public record of 110 disposed applications across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 44 were allowed and 66 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 40%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's record across both art units and reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition. The record does not include pending applications.
This pooled record aggregates Examiner Filosi's work across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 40% allowance rate is a historical aggregate—a summary of past dispositions across all assigned art units—and describes what has occurred, not what will occur on any individual application. Pooled figures mask variation among art units and do not function as predictions for specific cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 71 decided applications with an interview and 35 without.
Based on 4 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Terri L Filosi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 110 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP