LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/THAI Q PHAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Thai Q Phan

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 1,023 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2022
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Thai Q Phan has allowed 901 of 1,023 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

88% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2128 · 85%AU 2147 · 98%AU 2123 · 33%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Patent Examiner Thai Q Phan maintains a public record spanning 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,023 disposed applications, 901 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 88%. The allowance rate among individual art units ranges from 85% to 98%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units and reflects historical disposition data only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines outcomes across multiple art units into a single aggregate allowance rate. This figure describes the examiner's past decisions on disposed applications and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Because different art units may have different allowance rates, the pooled rate masks variation; a separate section of this page shows per-art-unit detail for applications within a specific art unit.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2128
767 APPS · 85% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.

85% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION651 / 116 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.6 moart unit avg 30 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39.2 moart unit avg 46.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility31% · art unit 65%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)47%
§103 — Obviousness24% · art unit 84%
§112 — Written description & definiteness23%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW85%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW85%0 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 33 decided applications with an interview and 734 without.

ART UNIT 2147
253 APPS · 98% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

98% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 44%
DISPOSITION249 / 4 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION29.2 moart unit avg 29.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY32.8 moart unit avg 46.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility37% · art unit 74%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)49%
§103 — Obviousness25% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness17%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW100%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW98%+2 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 17 decided applications with an interview and 236 without.

ART UNIT 2123
3 APPS · 33% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

33% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 51%
DISPOSITION1 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION15.5 moart unit avg 29.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY23.7 moart unit avg 43.8 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Thai Q Phan

  • What is Thai Q Phan's overall allowance rate?
    88% across 1,023 disposed applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    3 art units: 2123, 2128, and 2147.
  • Does the allowance rate vary among the art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 85% to 98% across the individual art units covered by this examiner.
  • Does this pooled rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. The pooled allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thai Q Phan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,023 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP