Examiner Thanh Ha T Dang has allowed 586 of 696 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Thanh Ha T Dang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 696 disposed applications, 586 were allowed and 110 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 84%. This rate reflects decided cases only and excludes pending applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, providing a pooled view of activity in this technology center. The 84% allowance rate is a historical aggregate and does not forecast the outcome of any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate (84% of 696 decided cases) describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of what will happen in any specific application. Aggregate figures mask variation across art units and do not reveal how the examiner handled particular invention types, claim structures, or office-action sequences. Pooled data provides context for the overall record but cannot predict individual case results.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 378 decided applications with an interview and 318 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thanh Ha T Dang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 696 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP