Examiner Thanh T Nguyen has allowed 36 of 77 decided applications (47%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Thanh T Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 77 disposed applications in a single art unit, the examiner allowed 36 applications and abandoned 41, yielding an allowance rate of 47% over decided cases. This allowance rate reflects the examiner's historical record on applications that reached a final disposition—either allowance or abandonment. The pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work within the specified technology center and art unit.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to the examiner and describes the historical pattern of dispositions. The allowance rate of 47% is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), not from all filings. This aggregate figure represents the examiner's past record and is not a prediction of the outcome of any individual application. Specific cases depend on claim scope, prior art, and examiner conduct in each prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 55 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thanh T Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 77 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP