Examiner Thanhnga B Truong has allowed 95 of 121 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Thanhnga B Truong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 121 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 95 cases, for an allowance rate of 79%. The record spans a single art unit. Of the disposed applications, 26 were abandoned. This pooled figure describes the examiner's past record across all art units in this technology center and does not predict outcomes in any individual application.
This page presents a pooled record—an aggregate of all art units where the examiner works. Pooled figures describe the past and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. The allowance rate reflects decided applications only (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. When an examiner works across multiple art units, pooled rates smooth variation among different subject areas; per-art-unit detail, where available, appears separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 32 decided applications with an interview and 89 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thanhnga B Truong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 121 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP