Examiner Thien Dang Nguyen has allowed 699 of 791 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Thien Dang Nguyen's public record spans 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 791 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 699, yielding an 88% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 79% to 93% across the examiner's art units. Of the examiner's 823 total applications on file, 92 were abandoned. This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units and reflects historical dispositions only.
A pooled record combines an examiner's allowance statistics across multiple art units, masking variation among individual units. The overall figures describe the past record and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show different allowance rates. Aggregate data reflects what happened in closed cases, not what will happen in any pending matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 223 decided applications with an interview and 325 without.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 121 decided applications with an interview and 122 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thien Dang Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 823 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP