Examiner Thomas A Gyorfi has allowed 29 of 64 decided applications (45%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Thomas A Gyorfi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 64 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 29 and abandoned 35, yielding an allowance rate of 45%. This rate reflects outcomes in a single art unit (2135) within TC 2100. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not reflect any pending filings. This pooled record represents the examiner's historical disposition across all their assigned art units in this technology center.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate and application counts shown here are historical summaries, not predictions about any specific application. When an examiner works in multiple art units, the pooled figures represent a weighted average of their behavior across those units. The aggregate data describes past performance and does not forecast the outcome of any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thomas A Gyorfi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 64 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP