Examiner Thomas Bernard Lane has allowed 13 of 15 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Thomas Bernard Lane's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 15 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 87%. Of the 38 total applications in the examiner's record, 13 were allowed and 2 were abandoned. The remaining applications are pending and are not included in the allowance rate calculation. This record reflects historical outcomes on decided applications only and does not indicate the disposition of any pending filing.
This pooled record aggregates activity across one art unit and reflects cumulative historical data. The allowance rate of 87% describes outcomes on 15 decided applications and represents the past record only. Aggregate statistics are descriptive of completed prosecutions and are not predictive of outcomes in any individual pending application. Review of the underlying art unit's specific record may provide additional detail.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 38 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thomas Bernard Lane has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 38 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP