LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/THOMAS BERNARD LANE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Thomas Bernard Lane

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 15 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Thomas Bernard Lane has allowed 13 of 15 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

87% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Thomas Bernard Lane's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 15 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 87%. Of the 38 total applications in the examiner's record, 13 were allowed and 2 were abandoned. The remaining applications are pending and are not included in the allowance rate calculation. This record reflects historical outcomes on decided applications only and does not indicate the disposition of any pending filing.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates activity across one art unit and reflects cumulative historical data. The allowance rate of 87% describes outcomes on 15 decided applications and represents the past record only. Aggregate statistics are descriptive of completed prosecutions and are not predictive of outcomes in any individual pending application. Review of the underlying art unit's specific record may provide additional detail.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2142
38 APPS · 87% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

87% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 45%
DISPOSITION13 / 2 / 23allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36.6 moart unit avg 30.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45.3 moart unit avg 48.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility73% · art unit 57%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)90%
§103 — Obviousness90% · art unit 93%
§112 — Written description & definiteness47%

Based on 38 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Thomas Bernard Lane

  • What is Thomas Bernard Lane's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 87%, calculated from 15 disposed applications (13 allowed and 2 abandoned). This figure describes the historical record on decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Thomas Bernard Lane's public record spans one art unit (2142) within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does the allowance rate include or exclude?
    The allowance rate includes allowed and abandoned applications. It excludes pending applications. Of 38 total applications in the record, 15 have been disposed; the remaining are pending.
  • Can I use this record to predict the outcome of my application?
    No. This pooled record describes historical outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application. Each application is examined on its individual merits.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thomas Bernard Lane has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 38 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP