Examiner Thomas R Peeso has allowed 366 of 394 decided applications (93%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Thomas R Peeso maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 394 applications. Of those decided applications, 366 were allowed and 28 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 93%. This rate reflects the examiner's pooled record across all assigned art units and describes outcomes in past applications only.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 93% is a historical aggregate—a summary of past dispositions—and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units and case types. The public record describes what occurred in closed cases, not what will occur in any pending matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thomas R Peeso has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 394 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP