Examiner Thu N Nguyen has allowed 448 of 615 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Thu N Nguyen holds a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 649 total applications, 448 were allowed and 167 abandoned, yielding 615 decided applications. The allowance rate stands at 73% of those decided applications. Allowance rates across the examiner's art units range from 50% to 81%, reflecting variation in the disposition patterns within this technology center.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across multiple art units in TC 2100, presenting a pooled allowance rate and range. The 73% figure describes historical outcomes on decided applications and does not predict the result of any particular filing. The range (50%–81%) shows that allowance rates differ among the art units; individual art-unit records appear in a separate section of this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 165 decided applications with an interview and 292 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 63 decided applications with an interview and 94 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thu N Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 649 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP