Examiner Thu Nguyet T Le has allowed 500 of 630 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Thu Nguyet T Le maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 630 disposed applications, 500 were allowed and 130 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 79% of decided applications. This pooled figure reflects decisions made across both art units and represents the examiner's aggregated historical record in this technology center. The record does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 79% allowance rate describes the examiner's past performance across all assigned applications in those units, not a prediction for any individual case. Pooled figures mask variation among art units; applicants may review individual art-unit performance separately on this firm's pages. Aggregate statistics are correlational data, not causal indicators of any particular application's outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 310 decided applications with an interview and 317 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thu Nguyet T Le has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 630 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP