Examiner Thu V Huynh has allowed 358 of 593 decided applications (60%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Thu V Huynh has a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 593 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 358 and abandoned 235, yielding a 60% allowance rate. Allowance rates across the three art units range from 52% to 94%, reflecting variation in outcomes by art unit. This pooled figure aggregates different subject areas within TC 2100 and represents historical disposition data only.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units and does not isolate performance in any single art unit or subject matter. The overall allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Variation across art units is common and reflects differences in art-unit composition and application characteristics, not examiner conduct. Pooled data provides context for an examiner's overall record only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 205 decided applications with an interview and 139 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 97 decided applications with an interview and 88 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 42 decided applications with an interview and 22 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thu V Huynh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 593 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP