LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/THUONG NGUYEN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Thuong Nguyen

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 45 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Thuong Nguyen has allowed 22 of 45 decided applications (49%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

49% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Thuong Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 45 disposed applications, the examiner has allowed 22 and abandoned 23. The allowance rate is 49% of decided applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents applications decided over the examiner's tenure in this technology center and does not constitute a prediction for any individual pending application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across art units assigned to the examiner. The 49% allowance rate describes historical outcomes on decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Pooled figures reflect the examiner's past work and serve as reference data only. They are not predictive of outcomes on specific applications and do not account for individual application facts, claim scope, or prior art.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2155
45 APPS · 49% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

49% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION22 / 23 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION38.9 moart unit avg 27.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY56.4 moart unit avg 42.2 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Thuong Nguyen

  • What is Examiner Thuong Nguyen's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 49% across 45 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's record spans one art unit.
  • What do these figures mean for my application?
    This pooled record describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any individual application's outcome. Each application is examined on its own merits based on the claims, specification, and prior art.
  • Why does the record show both allowed and abandoned applications?
    The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications—those allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded from this calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thuong Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 45 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP