Examiner Thuy N Pardo has allowed 191 of 242 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Thuy N Pardo maintains a pooled allowance rate of 79% across 242 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's record spans three art units: 2165, 2168, and 2175. Of the 242 decided applications, 191 were allowed and 51 were abandoned. Allowance rates across the examiner's art units range from 77% to 85%, reflecting variation in outcomes by art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall record and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units into a single overall allowance rate. This aggregate reflects past outcomes across different subject areas within TC 2100 and describes historical performance only. The range of allowance rates (77% to 85%) indicates that outcomes vary by art unit. Aggregate statistics do not predict outcomes in any specific application or art unit. Individual art-unit data, where available separately, may provide more granular context.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 37 decided applications with an interview and 123 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Thuy N Pardo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 242 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP