Examiner Tina Huynh has allowed 186 of 248 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tina Huynh maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 248 disposed applications, she has allowed 186 and abandoned 62, yielding an allowance rate of 75%. This rate is based on decided applications and does not include pending cases. The pooled figure reflects her combined activity across both art units and provides a statistical summary of her examination outcomes without predicting results on any individual application.
This record aggregates Examiner Huynh's examination activity across multiple art units within TC 2100. Pooled statistics describe the past distribution of outcomes—allowances and abandonments—across all decided cases. The 75% allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of outcome on any specific application. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation from the pooled figure.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 169 decided applications with an interview and 77 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 2 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tina Huynh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 248 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP