LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/TIRUMALE K RAMESH
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Tirumale K Ramesh

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 43 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Tirumale K Ramesh has allowed 10 of 43 decided applications (23%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

23% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Tirumale K Ramesh maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 88 total applications, 43 have been disposed. Of those 43 decided applications, 10 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 23%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. The data presented reflects the examiner's pooled historical performance and does not predict outcomes in any specific case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units into a single pooled profile. The 23% allowance rate describes decisions already rendered—allowed and abandoned applications combined—over 43 decided cases. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units and reflect past decisions only. They are not predictions for any application under examination.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2121
88 APPS · 23% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

23% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION10 / 33 / 45allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35.3 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY53.7 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility73% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)79%
§103 — Obviousness99% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness42%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW32%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW17%+15 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 19 decided applications with an interview and 24 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Tirumale K Ramesh

  • What is Examiner Ramesh's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 23%, based on 10 allowed applications out of 43 total disposed applications in the examiner's pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Examiner Ramesh's public record spans one art unit, within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate mean?
    The pooled rate aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's assigned art units. It describes past decisions and does not predict the outcome of any pending or future application.
  • How many total applications are in this record?
    The examiner has a record of 88 total applications, of which 43 have been disposed (decided), 10 allowed, and 33 abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tirumale K Ramesh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 88 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP