Examiner Titus Wong has allowed 529 of 678 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Titus Wong maintains a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 678 decided applications, the examiner has allowed 529, yielding an overall allowance rate of 78%. This rate is computed from applications that have been allowed or abandoned; pending applications are excluded. The allowance rate across the examiner's individual art units ranges from 68% to 95%, reflecting variation in the decided record within this technology center.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units. The overall allowance rate describes what has occurred in the past across all units combined and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may show different rates. Pooled statistics describe the aggregate historical record only and carry no predictive force for any single case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 123 decided applications with an interview and 255 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 92 decided applications with an interview and 126 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 28 decided applications with an interview and 54 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Titus Wong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 709 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP