Examiner Toan H Vu has allowed 535 of 636 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Toan H Vu maintains a public record across 4 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 636 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 84%. The examiner's record spans multiple art units (2141, 2174, 2177, 2178), and allowance rates across these units range from 71% to 96%. Of 672 total applications, 535 were allowed and 101 were abandoned. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across all four art units and describes the historical record only.
This profile presents a pooled record—a single aggregate allowance rate across multiple art units. The 84% figure reflects decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application. Pooled data masks variation among individual art units; the 71% to 96% range illustrates that outcomes differ by art unit. Historical statistics describe past performance and are not forecasts of future dispositions.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 149 decided applications with an interview and 127 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 36 decided applications with an interview and 163 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 129 without.
Based on 5 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Toan H Vu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 672 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP