Examiner Todd Aguilera has allowed 308 of 523 decided applications (59%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Todd Aguilera's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across 3 art units. Over 523 decided applications, his allowance rate is 59%, with 308 allowed and 215 abandoned. The allowance rate ranges from 58% to 62% across these art units. This pooled figure aggregates his record in art units 2192, 2196, and 2198 and reflects outcomes on applications that have been decided, excluding pending matters.
A pooled record combines data from multiple art units into a single aggregate. The allowance rate shown is the percentage of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and describes what has occurred in the examiner's past record across TC 2100. This historical aggregate is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Per-art-unit detail may be available separately and can show variation across different technical areas within the technology center.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 246 decided applications with an interview and 80 without.
Primarily examines software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 60 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 50 decided applications with an interview and 55 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Todd Aguilera has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 578 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP