Examiner Todd D Ingberg has allowed 162 of 201 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Todd D Ingberg has disposed of 201 applications across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 162 were allowed and 39 were abandoned, yielding an 81% allowance rate. The examiner's record spans art units 2122, 2124, and 2193. Allowance rates across these art units range from 72% to 82%, reflecting variation in outcomes by art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record and describes past decisions without predicting outcomes in any specific case.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across multiple art units in TC 2100. The overall allowance rate of 81% is a pooled statistic calculated from all 201 decided applications. Because different art units may have different claim patterns and validity questions, the allowance rate varies by art unit (72% to 82%). This pooled figure is historical and does not predict the outcome of any individual application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 93 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Todd D Ingberg has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 201 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP