Examiner Tomasz Ponikiewski has allowed 11 of 26 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tomasz Ponikiewski maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 26 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 11 and abandoned 15, yielding an allowance rate of 42%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not reflect pending or unfiled cases. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units and describes the historical record without predicting outcomes in any individual case.
This examiner's public record is pooled across all assigned art units within TC 2100. Aggregate statistics describe past disposition patterns and provide context for understanding the examiner's historical practice. Pooled allowance rates are not predictions of the outcome in any specific application. The record reflects decided cases only (allowed and abandoned), excluding pending applications. Individual art units may have different patterns; those are available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tomasz Ponikiewski has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 26 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP