LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/TOMASZ PONIKIEWSKI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Tomasz Ponikiewski

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 26 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION FEB 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Tomasz Ponikiewski has allowed 11 of 26 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

42% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Tomasz Ponikiewski maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 26 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 11 and abandoned 15, yielding an allowance rate of 42%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not reflect pending or unfiled cases. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units and describes the historical record without predicting outcomes in any individual case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's public record is pooled across all assigned art units within TC 2100. Aggregate statistics describe past disposition patterns and provide context for understanding the examiner's historical practice. Pooled allowance rates are not predictions of the outcome in any specific application. The record reflects decided cases only (allowed and abandoned), excluding pending applications. Individual art units may have different patterns; those are available separately.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2165
26 APPS · 42% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

42% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION11 / 15 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION30.3 moart unit avg 22.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45.1 moart unit avg 39.6 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Tomasz Ponikiewski

  • What is Examiner Ponikiewski's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 42%, calculated from 26 disposed applications (11 allowed, 15 abandoned). This figure applies to the pooled record across all art units and is historical data, not a prediction of any specific case.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Examiner Ponikiewski is assigned to one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does the allowance rate include and exclude?
    The allowance rate reflects only decided applications—those allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded. The rate does not indicate the path any individual application will take.
  • Does this record predict the outcome of my application?
    No. This is a historical aggregate and does not predict outcomes in any specific application. Each case is examined individually.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tomasz Ponikiewski has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 26 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP