Examiner Tongoc Tran has allowed 70 of 99 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Tongoc Tran maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. Across 99 disposed applications, 70 were allowed and 29 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 71%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications and does not constitute a prediction for any individual case. The examiner's record is pooled across all assigned art units and represents historical data only.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate of 71% describes past dispositions over 99 decided applications and is not a forecast for any specific application. Aggregate statistics reflect historical performance and vary by individual case, art unit, and application characteristics. Pooled figures provide context for the examiner's overall record but do not predict outcomes on pending or future matters.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 24 decided applications with an interview and 75 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tongoc Tran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 99 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP