Examiner Tony Wu has allowed 128 of 231 decided applications (55%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Tony Wu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 260 total applications, 231 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Of those 231 decided applications, 128 were allowed, yielding a 55% allowance rate. The record spans one art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate history across that unit and does not predict outcomes in any individual application.
This record aggregates dispositions across one art unit in TC 2100. Pooled statistics describe the examiner's past record and reflect the mix of applications examined within that unit. An aggregate allowance rate is a historical summary, not a forecast for any specific application. Applicants may also review per-art-unit records, where available, to see breakdowns by narrower subject matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 118 decided applications with an interview and 113 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tony Wu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 260 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP