Examiner Tracey M Mcghee

What the data says.

Tracey M Mcghee maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 210 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 105 and abandoned 105, yielding an allowance rate of 50%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to total decided applications and does not represent a prediction for any specific case. All figures are pooled across the examiner's art-unit assignments within TC 2100.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units (if applicable) to show overall historical disposition. The allowance rate of 50% describes past decisions on 210 closed applications and is not a forecast of outcomes on any individual pending application. Pooled figures reflect the examiner's combined practice and do not indicate how any particular technology or claim type will be treated.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Tracey M Mcghee

• 01What is Tracey M Mcghee's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 50%, based on 210 disposed applications (105 allowed, 105 abandoned). This is a historical ratio and not a prediction for any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The public pooled record covers 1 art unit (Art Unit 2154) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the 50% allowance rate mean?

  Of the 210 applications decided by this examiner, 50% were allowed and 50% were abandoned. This ratio describes past outcomes on closed applications only and does not apply to pending cases.
• 04Can I use this record to predict the outcome of my application?

  No. Historical allowance rates describe past dispositions and are not predictions of outcomes on any pending or future application. Individual results depend on claim scope, prior art, and examination conduct specific to each case.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.