Examiner Tracy A Warren has allowed 392 of 471 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Tracy A Warren maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 471 decided applications, the examiner issued allowances in 392 cases, yielding an 83% allowance rate. The record spans art units 2131 and 2137. Allowance rates across these art units range from 66% to 93%. Of 504 total applications in the examiner's record, 79 were abandoned. These figures represent the pooled, historical outcome data and do not constitute a prediction for any pending or future application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across multiple art units within TC 2100. The overall allowance rate of 83% is computed from all decided applications pooled together and reflects past outcomes. The range (66% to 93%) shows variation among individual art units but does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate statistics describe historical performance and are not forecasts of prosecution success in any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 118 decided applications with an interview and 179 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 101 decided applications with an interview and 73 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Tracy A Warren has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 504 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP