Examiner Trang Khanh Ta has allowed 259 of 325 decided applications (80%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Trang Khanh Ta maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 325 disposed applications, the examiner issued 259 allowances and recorded 66 abandonments. The allowance rate is 80% over the decided application count. This record aggregates outcomes from multiple art units within TC 2100 and reflects historical data only, not a prediction for any individual application.
A pooled record combines outcomes from multiple art units into a single aggregate. The overall allowance rate and application counts shown here are summaries of past decisions across all the examiner's assigned art units in TC 2100. These figures describe what occurred in closed cases and do not forecast the outcome of any pending or future application. Individual art-unit records may differ from the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 160 decided applications with an interview and 148 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 17 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Trang Khanh Ta has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 325 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP