Examiner Trang T Doan

What the data says.

Examiner Trang T Doan maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 58 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 35 cases, yielding an allowance rate of 60% over the decided pool. The remaining 23 applications were abandoned. This examiner's work spans a single art unit, consolidating the record into one pooled dataset. The allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to all decided applications and does not represent a prediction for any specific case.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to an examiner. The figures presented—allowance rate, application counts, and art-unit breadth—describe historical dispositions and past outcomes only. They are correlational snapshots of completed applications, not predictive indicators of any individual application's prospects. Each new case presents distinct claim scope, prior art, and examiner analysis.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Trang T Doan

• 01What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?

  Examiner Doan's allowance rate is 60%, computed from 35 allowed applications out of 58 total disposed applications in the public record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  This examiner is assigned to one art unit (2131), covering Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the 60% allowance rate mean for my application?

  The allowance rate is a historical statistic of decided cases. It is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Each case depends on claim language, prior art, and prosecution history.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  The examiner has disposed of 58 applications, of which 35 were allowed and 23 were abandoned.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.