Examiner Travis Viet Tran has allowed 18 of 19 decided applications (95%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Travis Viet Tran maintains a public record of 51 total applications across Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 19 disposed applications, 18 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 95%. One application was abandoned. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
This record aggregates all art units under which the examiner has issued decisions. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past dispositions and do not constitute predictions about any specific application. The allowance rate reflects decided cases only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending applications. Aggregate statistics represent historical performance across the examiner's portfolio, not forecasts for individual cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Travis Viet Tran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 51 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP