Examiner Trenton J Roche has allowed 64 of 86 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Trenton J Roche maintains a public record across two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 86 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 74%, measured against 64 allowed and 22 abandoned applications. This pooled figure represents the proportion of decided cases and does not include pending matters. The record spans art units 2124 and 2193, integrating outcomes from multiple examination areas within the technology center's scope.
This record aggregates outcomes across two separate art units, producing a single allowance rate that reflects combined output. Pooled figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art-unit rates may differ from the overall percentage. Aggregate statistics offer context on historical patterns but do not determine the outcome of any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 23 decided applications with an interview and 49 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Trenton J Roche has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 86 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP