Examiner Truc T Chuong has allowed 184 of 257 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Truc T Chuong maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 257 decided applications, the examiner allowed 184 and abandoned 73, yielding an allowance rate of 72%. This rate reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all decided cases in the pooled record. The examiner's work spans art units 2174 and 2179, and the 72% figure represents aggregate performance across these units combined.
This pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units within TC 2100. The 72% allowance rate describes historical outcomes across all decided applications in the examiner's combined record, not a prediction of any specific application. Aggregate figures smooth out unit-specific variation and show overall patterns. Individual art-unit records may differ from this pooled rate. The statistic reflects past decisions only and carries no predictive weight for future filings.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Truc T Chuong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 257 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP