LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/TRUONG V VO
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Truong V Vo

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 1,003 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION NOV 2025
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Truong V Vo has allowed 859 of 1,003 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

86% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2156 · 88%AU 2169 · 31%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Truong V Vo maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,003 decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate stands at 86%. This figure represents allowed applications as a percentage of applications that have been decided (allowed or abandoned), excluding any pending matters. Across the examiner's art units, allowance rates range from 31% to 88%, reflecting variation in the record within TC 2100.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, producing a single allowance rate that describes past decisions in aggregate. This overall figure is a historical snapshot and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Variation across individual art units—shown by the range—indicates that allowance rates differ by art unit. To understand performance in a particular art unit, refer to the art-unit-specific data section.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2156
972 APPS · 88% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

88% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 69%
DISPOSITION847 / 117 / 8allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20 moart unit avg 20.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.5 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility30% · art unit 56%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)84%
§103 — Obviousness52% · art unit 84%
§112 — Written description & definiteness17%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW90%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW86%+4 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 335 decided applications with an interview and 629 without.

ART UNIT 2169
39 APPS · 31% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

31% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION12 / 27 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION25.3 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37.7 moart unit avg 40 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Truong V Vo

  • What is Truong V Vo's overall allowance rate?
    86% across 1,003 decided applications, pooled across all art units.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    2 art units (2156 and 2169) in Technology Center 2100.
  • Do allowance rates differ across this examiner's art units?
    Yes. Allowance rates range from 31% to 88% across the examiner's art units. The 86% overall figure is an aggregate and does not represent performance in any single unit.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Truong V Vo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,011 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP