Examiner Tse W Chen

What the data says.

Tse W Chen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 251 disposed applications, 173 were allowed and 78 were abandoned, yielding a 69% allowance rate. The examiner's work spans a single art unit (2116). This pooled record reflects decided applications only and does not include pending filings. The allowance rate is computed as the percentage of allowed applications among all disposed matters.

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units into a single pooled allowance rate and disposition count. The figures describe historical outcomes on decided applications and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Pooled data masks variation across individual art units; detailed art-unit-specific rates, where available, may differ from the aggregate figure presented here.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

Questions about Examiner Tse W Chen

• 01What is Tse W Chen's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 69% across 251 disposed applications in TC 2100. This rate reflects the percentage of allowed applications among all decided matters and is not a prediction for any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  Tse W Chen's record spans one art unit (2116). The pooled figures shown here aggregate the examiner's work across all assigned art units.
• 03What do these statistics mean for my application?

  This pooled historical record describes past dispositions and does not predict the outcome of any individual application. Allowance rates are correlational, not causal. Each application is examined on its own merits.
• 04Why is the total different from allowed plus abandoned?

  Disposed applications (251) equal allowed (173) plus abandoned (78). This count excludes pending applications and reflects only decided matters used to compute the allowance rate.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.